I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is fifty bullets. But I really need to find a bullet during the a hundred and sixty class that my older rifle likes.
I have utilised H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There aren't a lot of cartridges which i use it for as I seem to be usually to gravitate to other powders. Having said that, I can not say that it will not work. It is simply that some other powders operate much better for your supplied cartridge. As an example, during the 280, H4831 gave me excellent velocity and really fine groups with Nosler 140 AB. On the other hand, RL19 was marginally much better in accuracy, nevertheless the velocity was practically similar.
Can they be interchanged without problems other then applying usual load procedures when switching from good deal to great deal?
243, and several of the loads I have began with consist of, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am planning to shoot the IMR7828 loads very first, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises if the H-4831sc loads exhibit a shotgun pattern! Who understands, I just could look for a use for it after all.
Novice to reloading. This will be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I had been in the position to get my hands on a couple kilos of h4831.
Did you at any time consider H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I have a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with typical chamber. Questioning What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
I am utilizing it which has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. RL22 did h4831sc nicely but I was a little bit concerned about temp steadiness. I do think I am at seventy two grains and have about 2850ish fps
If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you could possibly find a load that works Alright With all the 4831. The bullets I attempted that were about 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which had the conventional 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the most important bullet that would stabilize, but it did that superbly. It is a amusing-seeking bullet that has a h4831sc rounded nose profile, however it shoots wonderful and kills well. Deer out to about 150 yards al went down without delay with rib-cage hits.
Any load data to aid that? My 1st considered is it isn't about to burn up many of the way and velocities will likely be gradual and in all places. Is likely to be a nice fireworks Exhibit!
locutus claimed: I still have a great stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows by way of my powder actions efficiently.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are completely various powders, with IMR 4831 getting considerably more rapidly in comparison to the Hodgdon variants. You should not address them as the same powder, since they most certainly will not be.
Like Everybody mentioned, the SC stands for “small Minimize” and is a little bit simpler to meter. Helps make you query why they would still make the typical a person.
A few of the previous Lyman data h4831 vs h4831sc just detailed IMR 4831, which was surplus military services powder and now more recent mfg as H4831.
I sawed 1 in fifty percent to view how thick the jackets ended up, plus they were being conveniently 2 times as thick as a fifty-grain hollow point was. Ditto for the 64-grain Power Point, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know every little thing I learn about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I don't know something whatsoever regarding the 223. I doubt that you are going to get any where with that cartridge and 4831, but let's understand how it goes.